A Dream Deferred or a Promise Reclaimed?

Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!

In Sierra Leone, aspirations for better living conditions drive education, migration, and opportunity-seeking, especially among youth. These ambitions influence national priorities, but sustainable progress depends on modernisation rooted in local culture rather than on the replication of foreign models. An overemphasis on global integration can lead to exclusion and erode cultural identity. Low public trust and elite dominance further alienate citizens. Genuine progress requires locally grounded transformation. This paper examines the historical and institutional roots of Sierra Leone’s development challenges, how modernisation affects identity, the economy, and education, and whether decentralisation can enable more inclusive growth. The main argument is that authentic decentralisation empowers communities to develop in culturally relevant ways within a unified nation.

The Legacy of Political Gaslighting and Institutional Betrayal

What the state promised and what people experienced

The Local Government Act 2004 shifted powers, responsibilities, and resources from central government to local councils, giving them authority over public services and local revenue. International donors, including the World Bank, supported these reforms. Notably, the World Bank’s 2011 DSDP-2 program allocated $26 million to improve key services, including health, water, sanitation, waste management, and infrastructure, across all nineteen local councils.

Many citizens found government and donor projects failed to deliver on promises, with hospitals remaining under-resourced—most evident during the 2014 Ebola crisis. Ongoing infrastructure problems, such as flooding and landslides, highlighted poor planning and maintenance, while remote areas saw little progress. As a result, decentralisation was viewed as superficial, increasing scepticism and feelings of exclusion, and undermining trust in leadership. However, some analysts argue these issues are common during transitions, noting that meaningful reforms take time and can eventually improve governance and services with continued investment.

Gaslighting through omission and distortion

The gap between official promises and real results constitutes political gaslighting, encouraging citizens to believe in progress despite ongoing infrastructure deficits and the marginalisation of local languages and histories. Claims that reforms are intended to enhance global competitiveness often shift blame for poverty to individuals rather than acknowledging institutional failures, thereby obscuring problems and preventing accountability.

This distortion extends beyond misinformation by concealing shortcomings and exaggerating achievements. Political messaging shapes collective memory and makes it harder to hold leaders responsible. As a result, many Sierra Leoneans now see traditional practices as obsolete and feel compelled to adopt outside models, even when those may be harmful.

Trust: The Currency That Collapsed

Trust in institutions, leadership, and communities is crucial for cohesion, but it is lacking in Sierra Leone. Of about 80 functions intended to be devolved to local councils, only 56 have been implemented. Councils face chronic underfunding, with local government spending making up just 1.9% of national expenditure in 2015/16. Tax collection is also weak due to public mistrust, poor understanding of taxation, and concerns about corruption, all of which reduce compliance.

• Many councils still lack trained staff, technical skills, and resources, making it hard for them to plan and provide good public services.

Many citizens in Sierra Leone and Liberia rely on kinship and informal networks for security and resources due to weak formal institutions and legacies of centralised governance. Limited trust in government and unmet expectations have reinforced these informal structures, which are seen as more dependable than official avenues. While modernisation has introduced new connections, it often yields superficial change rather than genuine transformation, as reliance on traditional networks persists.

Modernisation Without Foundations: The Erosion of Local Economies and Cultures

Many young Sierra Leoneans view modernisation as urbanisation, learning English, pursuing a Western education, and consuming imported goods. However, these trends may not be sustainable without integrating local economies and traditions. Traditional industries such as pottery, agriculture, and fishing have declined due to increased formal education and the import of goods, including Asian rice and European second-hand clothing, thereby undermining rural livelihoods (World Bank, 2011). Education primarily focuses on Western subjects, with limited attention to local languages and histories; secondary schools prioritise foreign literature over local narratives (Conteh, 2025). This shift risks cultural loss, dependency, and alienation among youth.

The Politics of Identity and Exclusion – How Modernisation Becomes a Gatekeeper

In Sierra Leone, political identity has long influenced access to power and resources, evolving from colonial divisions into entrenched ethno-regional party politics and patronage. Despite decentralisation reforms after the civil war, local authorities remain divided between elected councils and traditional leaders, resulting in unclear governance and ongoing disputes. This system tends to favour those with strong regional, ethnic, or political ties, while others are often excluded from development opportunities.

Education: Between Alienation, Amnesia, and Missed Opportunity

Sierra Leone’s schools often favour Western languages and standards, sidelining local knowledge and traditions. Decentralisation has shifted resources to technical education while reducing emphasis on history and arts. This leaves students academically successful but detached from community heritage, contributing to brain drain and skills mismatches (World Bank, 2011). Neglecting indigenous culture weakens the role of education in local and national development.

Collective Trauma, Learned Hopelessness When Modernisation Masks Pain

Sierra Leone’s history—from slavery and colonialism to civil war, Ebola, disasters, and inequality—continues to impact its people profoundly. Persistent shortcomings in governance and development foster widespread hopelessness and disengagement from national politics. Many turn to informal work or migration, weakening community ties and eroding cultural identity. Without societal reconciliation and collective remembrance, lasting reforms remain at risk, and future generations may lose their sense of belonging.

Decentralisation: A Structure for Restoration What It Could Be, and What It Needs

Despite earlier setbacks, decentralisation retains significant potential as a governance framework, provided it is re-envisioned, reformed, and revitalised.

7.1 What Decentralisation Is and What It Was Supposed to Be.

Even with past challenges, decentralisation can still work well if it is updated, improved, and given new energy and authority over centralised public services, planning, development, taxation, and regional governance.

• Councils are empowered to raise “own-source revenue”: property taxes, fees, licences, local charges, and to receive intergovernmental transfers from the central government (recurrent grants, development grants, grants for devolved functions).
• The establishment of a fiscal‑decentralisation framework (through the Fiscal Decentralisation Division under the Ministry of Finance, Sierra Leone) created mechanisms for budget preparation, revenue mobilisation, and fair grant distribution, theoretically creating a stable intergovernmental fiscal system.
• Over the years, further legislative updates, including the Local Government Act, 2022, indicate continuing efforts. Thus, the legal and institutional framework for grounded, pluralistic modernisation is already in place. The current challenge is to realise its potential. If revitalised and genuinely implemented, decentralisation could: vitalised and genuinely implemented, decentralisation could:
• Allow local cultures, priorities, and identities to shape development: Instead of imposing uniform, centrally designed “solutions,” districts, town councils, and chiefdoms could plan based on local needs, such as agriculture, fishing, mining, crafts, and trade. Local planning fosters diversity rather than homogenization.
• Protect cultural sovereignty: Local councils could support cultural education, mother‑tongue instruction, oral history, traditional crafts, storytelling festivals, and apprenticeship programmes. This would counter erasure and preserve heritage.
• Enable inclusive, community-based governance: through ward committees, community consultations, transparent budgeting, and community awareness programs, citizens can take part in decisions that affect their lives. Local ownership can lessen reliance and strengthen resilience.
• Build social cohesion beyond ethnic or party identity: When governance is local, service delivery neutral, and resources distributed, people may feel less need to align along ethnic or party lines. Civic belonging, rather than identity politics, can emerge.
• Restore confidence and responsibility: With local visibility, neighbours, community members, and councillors, abuse, corruption, and neglect become harder to hide. Disclosure and local oversight become feasible.

Recent empirical research (2025) shows that while residents of Kenema District Council reported improvements in infrastructure and government buildings, issues like low revenue mobilisation, limited public engagement, perceptions of corruption, and poor tax knowledge persist. Although interventions such as fiscal education and accountability measures may help, ongoing challenges suggest that piecemeal solutions are insufficient. The following discussion outlines targeted recommendations for more effective and sustainable decentralisation reforms.

Critical Preconditions: What Must Change for Decentralisation to Work

Decentralisation can be effective, but only if it is implemented with clear goals, sufficient resources, and strong accountability. Several important reforms are needed:

• Sustainable and predictable funding: Local councils must obtain prompt, adequate grants, as well as support to build their own‑revenue. Recent policy direction indicates a renewed priority: the 2025 Fiscal Decentralisation Policy and Strategy; however, implementation must follow.
• Capacity building and administrative strengthening: Councils need trained staff, technical skills, transparent procurement systems, and audit and accountability mechanisms. Without capacity, legal powers remain abstract.
• Clarity in local–traditional authority relations: The coexistence of elected councils and traditional structures (chiefdom councils, elders, clan leaders) necessitates clear role demarcation and joint effort, not competition. Ambiguous institutional “hybridity” risks power struggles and exclusion.
• Public participation and community learning programs: Citizens must be educated about the value of local taxation, participation, service demands, and rights, especially in rural areas. Lack of tax knowledge or distrust of the tax system deters compliance.
• Transparency, accountability, and anti-corruption measures: Strong oversight, audit, and civil society involvement, for example, through organisations like the Campaign for Good Governance, are vital. Local governance must resist capture by elites or partisan interests.
• Cultural inclusion in development planning: Local governments, schools, and universities ought to intentionally incorporate local languages, histories, crafts, and traditions into curricula and public programming, so that modernisation does not entail cultural erasure. For example, some districts have initiated mother-tongue instruction in early primary education and established community festivals that showcase traditional crafts and storytelling. These festivals not only feature displays of indigenous art forms and performances of oral histories, but also actively involve local artisans and elders as instructors and participants, creating intergenerational learning opportunities. Through activities such as traditional music performances, craft workshops, and the retelling of local folktales, these festivals serve as practical mechanisms for sustaining and transmitting cultural knowledge while fostering community cohesion alongside formal development efforts (Conteh, 2025).

If these preconditions are met, decentralisation has the potential to translate aspirations for improved living standards into tangible, enduring advances tailored to local needs, rather than replicating external models.

Conclusion: Toward a New Social Contract Modernisation Rooted in Selfhood and Society

Modernisation in Sierra Leone is unlikely to succeed if it continues to replicate foreign models that marginalise history, suppress identity, and impose external paradigms. As demonstrated in this analysis, superficial reforms and externally driven solutions have resulted in exclusion, cultural loss, and diminished communal trust. Genuine progress must be grounded in local culture, foster trust, respect diversity, and empower communities to direct their own development.

To achieve this, policymakers and stakeholders should focus on specific, actionable steps:

1. Prioritise the integration of local languages and histories within educational curricula to ensure cultural preservation alongside modern education.
2. Establish community-driven planning councils to represent local interests better and enable tailored development solutions.
3. Implement regular capacity-building workshops to empower local leaders in governance and resource management.
4. Encourage public-private partnerships that support local industries and crafts, creating sustainable economic opportunities.
5. Promote transparent tax systems. With adequate support, resources, and comprehensive reforms, decentralisation can serve as an effective solution. It can restore dignity, promote diversity, and empower those most impacted by development challenges. Achieving these outcomes requires a concerted focus on substantive action by citizens, civil society, and leadership, rather than rhetorical commitments. Citizens, civil society, and leaders must focus on real action, not just words.

Modernisation should reinforce, rather than diminish, Sierra Leonean identity. It should facilitate the adoption of new technologies and practices while maintaining a strong connection to traditional knowledge. Development initiatives ought to encompass all languages, ensure political representation for every community, and promote an inclusive sense of identity that unites rather than divides.

References

• Citation: The Local Government Act, 2004. Government of Sierra Leone.
• Use: Foundational legislation establishing decentralisation; use when referencing the legal basis for local councils.
• Link: sierra-leone.org

1. World Bank: Decentralised Service Delivery Program II (DSDP-II)

• Citation: World Bank. (2011). Sierra Leone to Scale-Up Decentralised Delivery of Key Public Services in All 19 Local Councils.
• Use: Supports historical background on decentralisation efforts and funding.
• Link: worldbank.org

1. CLGF Country Profile: Sierra Leone

• Citation: Commonwealth Local Government Forum (CLGF). (2017). The Local Government System in Sierra Leone.
• Use: Useful for statistics on local government funding, the number of councils, and devolution status.
• Link: clgf.org.uk

1. JICA Research Institute Working Paper No. 119

• Citation: Yamada, S. (2016). Decentralisation in Sierra Leone: Establishing Local Governments in Post-Conflict Society. JICA Research Institute.
• Use: Highlights political reasons for decentralisation reforms.
• Link: jica.go.jp

1. World Bank Open Knowledge Repository

• Citation: World Bank. (2009). Local Government Discretion alongside Accountability in Sierra Leone.
• Use: Discusses governance discretion, challenges in accountability and funding.
• Link: openknowledge.worldbank.org

1. Fiscal Decentralisation Policy & Strategy 2025

• Citation: Ministry of Finance, Sierra Leone. (2025). Fiscal Decentralisation Policy & Strategy 2025.
• Use: Relevant for discussing recent policy guidance and fiscal reforms.
• Link: mof.gov.sl

1. Decentralisation and Local Power in Post-War Sierra Leone

• Citation: Fanthorpe, R. (2005). On the Limits of Liberal Peace: Decentralisation, Governance and Conflict in Sierra Leone. African Affairs, 105(418), 27–49.
• Use: Analyses tensions between decentralised governance and local elite capture.

1. Evaluating Local Governance Efficiency (Kenema District Study)

• Citation: Conteh, I. A. (2025). Evaluating Local Governance Efficiency Through Decentralisation: Insights from Kenema District Council. International Journal of Academic Research.
• Use: Offers empirical support from a recent (2025) study on local development impacts and community perceptions.
• Link: researchgate.net

1. DFID: Sierra Leone Decentralisation Research Report

• Citation: M’cleod, H. (2007). Decentralisation Research Report: Sierra Leone. DFID/Options.
• Use: Discusses governance hybrids, informal authority, and implementation challenges.
• Link: assets.publishing.service.gov.uk

1. Campaign for Good Governance (CGG)

• Citation: Campaign for Good Governance. (Ongoing). Policy briefs and accountability research in Sierra Leone.
• Use: Example of civil society engagement in decentralised governance.
• Link: CGG on Wikipedia